① Comparison · output archive
Broadcom (CA) CA View and IBM Content Manager OnDemand for z/OS both archive and retrieve mainframe output, and both bill on capacity. CA View rides the Broadcom mainframe portfolio on MIPS or MSU; Content Manager OnDemand rides IBM IPLA, a one time charge plus subscription and support, usually with Multiplatforms user licenses on top. Function overlaps, so the portfolio each sits in and the cost of moving years of retained archive decide the bill.
Follow the portfolio, and do not switch for price alone. CA View and Content Manager OnDemand both archive z/OS output well enough that capability rarely settles it. What settles it is the portfolio you already license: Content Manager OnDemand is the natural choice inside the IBM IPLA stack, and CA View is the natural choice inside a Broadcom mainframe portfolio with CA Deliver and CA Disk. Unlike fault diagnosis tools, the switching cost here is high, because the archive holds years of retained reports and indexes under retention and compliance rules, and migrating that history is a long, risky project. So the real lever is leverage on the incumbent: validate the licensed capacity, hold a credible alternative, and negotiate the renewal rather than chasing a migration that rarely pays back.
The function is close. The differences that matter at renewal sit in the portfolio, the contract model, and the cost of leaving:
| Dimension | CA View | IBM Content Manager OnDemand |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Broadcom, former CA Technologies | IBM |
| What it is | SYSOUT archival and retrieval (formerly SAR) | Report archive and retrieval for z/OS |
| Sits in | Broadcom output management family with CA Deliver, CA Disk | IBM IPLA stack, with Multiplatforms and Content Navigator |
| Licensing metric | MIPS or MSU capacity | IPLA one time charge, priced on capacity tier |
| Contract model | Capacity or Broadcom consumption | One time charge plus subscription and support, plus user licenses |
| Natural fit | Shops on a Broadcom mainframe portfolio deal | Shops consolidating on the IBM stack |
| Switching cost | High, years of retained archive to migrate | High, years of retained archive to migrate |
Directional and pattern level. Branding, portfolio composition, and consumption terms evolve, so confirm the current product names, the CMOD Multiplatforms license requirement, and the Broadcom agreement terms in your own schedules before modeling a renewal or a switch.
For most estates the portfolio you already run, and the archive you already hold, point the way. Use it this way:
Lean toward IBM Content Manager OnDemand if
Lean toward CA View if
Either way, the first lever is the same as for any capacity priced tool: validate the licensed MIPS or MSU against the systems that genuinely need it, decide the contract model deliberately, and treat a prepared alternative as leverage at the incumbent's renewal rather than as a migration you intend to run. See our CA View licensing page for the metric and audit traps in detail.
Close on features. The deal is won in the portfolio and the leverage.
Explainers: what auditors test and consolidating IBM MLC and IPLA agreements. Products: CA View licensing. Other comparisons: Abend-AID vs IBM Fault Analyzer and DFSORT vs Syncsort MFX. Hubs and commercial: the Broadcom (CA) buyer side guide, the IBM buyer side guide, and IBM contract review.
Audit notice or renewal under 18 months out? We mobilize within 48 hours.
Get expert help →Audit notice or renewal under 18 months out? We mobilize within 48 hours.